Interesting observation, The label is obviously reinforced within the TV series “Sex as well as the populous City”.

Interesting observation, The label is obviously reinforced within the TV series “Sex as well as the populous City”.

The men that are only women had as true non-sexual buddies had been homosexual. Otherwise, they’d intercourse with all the males inside their life. A classic type or type of reverse sexist insult to males, really. Kinda like, right males are just great for the one thing. LOL

  • Answer to anonymous
  • Quote anonymous


Even though it is a label that homosexual guys are more feminine, whenever this really is real, females do feel closer to them.

All homosexual guys are demonstrably better to trust as friends because they don’t have hidden sexual or romantic intentions when they talk to women, which is why women prefer them. As a lady, we find nearly all of my right male buddies have actually ulterior motives to your relationship.

  • Respond to Abby Blackburn
  • Quote Abby Blackburn

Yeah, that’s the barrier

Yeah, this is the barrier some communicative men that are straight with females. But about themselves and can make the woman feel that her feelings will be respected, and not pressured, straight men can develop close friendships with women too if they are straightforward and open.

Needless to say, you will find men and women who dogmatically do not think this kind of relationship from a man that is straight straight woman is achievable. But having said that, for many who are able to develop this type of friendship, it could be fulfilling. For instance, a guy and a lady in this type of relationship who respect one another’s relationships they have due to their other genuine intimate relationship can trade tips and insights in to the other sex whether they have questions regarding their relationships. Needless to say, this takes an amount of maturity, protection, and genuine relationship that lots of individuals are perhaps perhaps not effective at in a male-female relationship.

  • Respond to anonymous
  • Quote anonymous

Ulterior Motives, As fascinating as it might be to hypothesize in regards to the precept of “heterosexual guys having ulterior motives”

As as an issue in developing comfortable male-female relationships it really is, simply, a projection that is distorted with egocentrism, presumptions, stereotypes, and borderline misandry.

1. Whenever friendships/relationships that are forming many people, guys included don’t clearly state their intimate orientation. Certain, in many cases it might be a understood information, but in many cases we run predicated on our presumptions which have as much of the possibility to be wrong, or at the least maybe not 100% accurate them to be as we presume.

2. Did you ever hear of bisexuality? It is a thing this is certainly genuine. And much more people (including male individuals) think about on their own to be bisexual than solely homosexual. An information that seldom pops up in conversation until friendships/relationships are fairly more successful.

3. Ever heard of intimate fluidity? Any belief that the person is a narrowly defined in a box/category that is 100% exclusively _____ with regards to their sexual experiences/attractions (whether in past times, current or future) is really a construction we make inside our very own minds therefore we feel comfortable “defining” people or thinking into our big picture relationship schema that we know what they’re about in order to fit them. No matter what a person claims, jobs and sometimes even exactly what their real factual history happens to be as much as this moment. Our overt reactions about our intimate passions/histories are subconsciously, and often consciously, edited for public usage plus the message you might be getting, even though clearly stated, might not really function as entire story/picture. The words don’t always mean what you think they mean in many cases. As an example, my dead grandfather (passed away at 92), ended up being hitched, 8 young ones (nearly 2 dozen grandkids) had been faithfully monogamous to my grandma for more than 60 years and a proud, self-professed heterosexual (w/multiple non-heterosexual kiddies, grandchildren) proved to have experienced a male enthusiast for couple of years while abroad within the armed forces before he got hitched. Which was not a known reality he ever shared during their life time but ended up being discovered posthumously. Everybody was shocked, yet not shocked. Terms never capture the entire tale.

As the above also address assumptions/gender part stereotypes/presumptions/projections, etc.

Certain to my calling the “ulterior motives” idea a manifestation of egocentrism, presumptions, stereotypes, and borderline misandry.

4. There are numerous ulterior motives that drive the forming of relationships besides romance/sex. In the event that unstated potential of a romantic/sexual motive that is ulterior a driving element for whether or not a female can establish a cushty relationship with any guy informs us a whole lot in regards to the girl and it has nothing in connection with the guy, and never fundamentally also about truth. This will be all according to presumptions and projections.

5. Mention sex borderline and stereotyping misandry. Exactly just how are women any different than guys? A girl is simply as most likely, or otherwise not most most likely, to own romance/sex as a motive that is ulterior the formula for developing relationships with guys as vice versa. Let us maybe maybe perhaps not make think otherwise.

6. I need to laugh in the egocentrism included in this discussion that is whole. Exactly exactly What would make any woman genuinely believe that any, needless to express every, heterosexual man whom might start contact/friendship or a “relationship” (when you look at the broadest usage of the definition of) is drawn to you in a way that their ulterior motive is romance/sex. Take a peek around. Many people are maybe not “that” hot or attractive that this will also be into the forefront of these brain whenever people that are new saying hello. The truth is that within our day to day lives. Many people we all know, meet, and do form comfortable relationships with aren’t leads for romantic/sexual relationships. If that is your filter or lens. You might be the main one with all the motives that are ulterior.

7. That intimate orientation is one factor in whether or not you can easily set up a “comfortable” relationship with a person that is not through the very very first minute you meet a sexually sparked/dating variety of relationship. Will not bode well for the possible relationship success whenever you do find a guy with this spark.

  • Answer to Anonymous
  • Quote Anonymous

Intimate fluidity = bisexual

Seems like “sexual fluidity” is just about bisexual. Whenever you can like both sexes then you are bisexual. You don’t need to compensate a word that is new BISEXUAL

Directly and men that are bisexual interested in females so its not too difficult to genuinely believe that they could befriend ladies to ultimately get intercourse